Well prepared, the professor brought some of the most important reflections to the debate, whether from a legal or philosophical point of view. His explanation was very enriching, as he deconstructed some assumptions that guide the obtuse view that some parliamentarians who make up that committee have about the MST. Within a markedly neoliberal logic, they greatly emphasize the issue of the economic results of agrarian reform in Brazil, presenting it as a bad deal, without worrying about other equally important factors that involve this issue. In this sense, the professor observed that Salles could well be occupying the chair of the president of the Central Bank.
Another bias is that of trying to criminalize the movement's actions, labeling them as "invasion", when even the judiciary, as the professor pointed out, understands that the correct term would be "occupation". Incidentally, the term "occupation" originates from discussions within the judiciary itself. With good arguments, based on consistent theories, the professor made a real journey through the field of sociology, politics and philosophy. He remembered the ailments that educator Paulo Freire suffers in the country, when he is praised in every corner of the planet. As Vitor Nunes Leal observed, centuries have passed and we continue to be a country that grants favors and does not recognize rights.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário